Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs GRNY: how they differ

AVLV and GRNY hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and GRNY hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVGRNY
Amazon.com Inc3.18%3.02%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%2.69%
Apple Inc3.17%2.40%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%2.24%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%2.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.79%2.33%
Microsoft Corp1.63%2.38%
Union Pacific Corp1.53%2.39%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%2.33%
American Express Co1.01%2.17%
Deere & Co0.95%2.30%
KLA Corp0.93%2.75%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in GRNY
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Strategy Inc 3.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%Broadcom Inc 2.94%
Morgan Stanley 1.37%Arista Networks Inc 2.88%
Gilead Sciences Inc 1.29%Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%
ConocoPhillips 1.17%Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFundstrat
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%97.0%
Holdings27540

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or GRNY?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources