Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs IWM: how they differ

AVLV and IWM hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IWM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and IWM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVIWM
Jackson Financial Inc0.17%0.19%
Argan Inc0.16%0.34%
InterDigital Inc0.15%0.23%
Viasat Inc0.12%0.35%
Oscar Health Inc0.10%0.21%
Lantheus Holdings Inc0.09%0.23%
Urban Outfitters Inc0.08%0.13%
Brinker International Inc0.07%0.23%
Ormat Technologies Inc0.06%0.21%
StoneX Group Inc0.06%0.27%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc0.06%0.23%
SM Energy Co0.06%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in IWM
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Moog, Inc. 0.38%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%Hut 8 Corp. 0.37%
Apple Inc 3.17%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%UMB Financial Corp. 0.33%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%JFrog Ltd. 0.31%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.19%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%0.0%
Holdings2752014

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IWM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and IWM returned +21.2%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or IWM?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against IWM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-IWM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources