Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs FBCG: how they differ

AVLV and FBCG hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and FBCG hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and FBCG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVFBCG
Amazon.com Inc3.18%8.43%
Apple Inc3.17%9.64%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%3.90%
Microsoft Corp1.63%5.20%
Netflix Inc0.91%2.23%
Micron Technology Inc4.57%0.82%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%0.69%
Target Corp0.83%0.42%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%0.39%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.46%0.33%
Delta Air Lines Inc0.88%0.33%
United Airlines Holdings Inc0.68%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in FBCG
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%NVIDIA CORP 14.62%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%BROADCOM INC 3.74%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%
Union Pacific Corp 1.53%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 2.03%
ConocoPhillips 1.17%TESLA INC 1.45%
General Motors Co 1.11%APPLOVIN CORP 1.26%
Flex Ltd 1.06%WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19%
Applied Materials Inc 1.06%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisFidelity
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueBlue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.57%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%86.8%
Holdings275214

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or FBCG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or FBCG?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources