Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs FBCG: how they differ

ACWI and FBCG hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and FBCG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and FBCG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIFBCG
NVIDIA CORPORATION4.89%14.62%
APPLE INC.4.02%9.64%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.90%5.20%
AMAZON.COM, INC.2.58%8.43%
ALPHABET INC.2.26%9.10%
BROADCOM INC.1.90%3.74%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.34%3.90%
TESLA, INC.1.09%1.45%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY0.76%2.25%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.59%0.82%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED0.43%0.81%
NETFLIX, INC.0.40%2.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in FBCG
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 1.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%SANDISK CORP/DE 0.82%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.86%SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.66%FTAI AVIATION LTD 0.49%
WALMART INC. 0.58%ARITZIA INC 0.39%
ASML Holding N.V. 0.56%SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.38%
SK hynix Inc. 0.49%BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.29%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.43%NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

ACWI and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isMSCI ACWIBlue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.57%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%86.8%
Holdings2307214

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or FBCG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or FBCG?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources