Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs VONG: how they differ

AVLV and VONG hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and VONG hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVVONG
Amazon.com Inc3.18%5.07%
Apple Inc3.17%11.97%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%3.20%
Microsoft Corp1.63%8.98%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%1.28%
Lam Research Corp2.52%1.21%
Netflix Inc0.91%1.10%
KLA Corp0.93%0.76%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%0.31%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.52%0.26%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd0.79%0.22%
QUALCOMM Inc0.51%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in VONG
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Tesla Inc 3.48%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47%
Morgan Stanley 1.37%Mastercard Inc 1.20%
ConocoPhillips 1.17%AbbVie Inc 1.16%
General Motors Co 1.11%Oracle Corp 1.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%95.6%
Holdings275387

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and VONG returned +7.2%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or VONG?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources