Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs SPMO: how they differ

AVLV and SPMO hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and SPMO hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVSPMO
Micron Technology Inc4.57%10.72%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%2.78%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%2.60%
Lam Research Corp2.52%3.54%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%1.77%
Morgan Stanley1.37%0.96%
KLA Corp0.93%1.39%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%0.83%
Cummins Inc0.42%0.51%
Freeport-McMoRan Inc0.74%0.41%
General Motors Co1.11%0.41%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.84%0.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in SPMO
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%
Apple Inc 3.17%Broadcom Inc. 7.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Intel Corp. 2.95%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%
Microsoft Corp 1.63%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisInvesco
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%100.0%
Holdings27599

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or SPMO?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources