Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs SPMO: how they differ

ACWI and SPMO hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and SPMO hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWISPMO
NVIDIA CORPORATION4.89%8.46%
ALPHABET INC.2.26%4.81%
BROADCOM INC.1.90%7.58%
ALPHABET INC.1.87%3.81%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%2.78%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.0.59%10.72%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.0.58%4.14%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.56%3.85%
INTEL CORPORATION0.43%2.95%
CATERPILLAR INC.0.42%2.60%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.36%2.02%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.33%3.54%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in SPMO
APPLE INC. 4.02%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Albemarle Corp. 0.10%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. 0.09%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Hasbro, Inc. 0.06%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.34%Ralph Lauren Corp. 0.05%
TESLA, INC. 1.09%Invesco Ltd. 0.05%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.86%TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 0.05%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 0.76%Southwest Airlines Co. 0.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isMSCI ACWIS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%100.0%
Holdings230799

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or SPMO?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources