Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs VOE: how they differ

AVLV and VOE hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and VOE hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVVOE
General Motors Co1.11%1.21%
Delta Air Lines Inc0.88%1.01%
Target Corp0.83%1.03%
Devon Energy Corp0.82%0.83%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.84%0.79%
Allstate Corp/The0.74%1.06%
United Airlines Holdings Inc0.68%0.77%
Cheniere Energy Inc0.66%0.87%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.66%0.72%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.70%0.64%
Norfolk Southern Corp0.71%0.61%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.89%0.61%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in VOE
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%CRH PLC 1.24%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Apple Inc 3.17%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Phillips 66 1.18%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 1.10%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%PACCAR Inc 1.10%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Digital Realty Trust Inc 1.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%96.6%
Holdings275170

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and VOE returned +20.2%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or VOE?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources