Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs SCHG: how they differ

AVLV and SCHG hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and SCHG hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVSCHG
Amazon.com Inc3.18%5.68%
Apple Inc3.17%9.84%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%3.46%
Microsoft Corp1.63%7.18%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%1.48%
Netflix Inc0.91%1.27%
KLA Corp0.93%0.88%
Progressive Corp/The1.04%0.39%
T-Mobile US Inc0.66%0.31%
Targa Resources Corp0.83%0.19%
WW Grainger Inc0.75%0.19%
Visa Inc0.14%1.92%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in SCHG
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Broadcom Inc 4.55%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Tesla Inc 3.92%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%Eli Lilly & Co 3.06%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Mastercard Inc 1.41%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.25%
Union Pacific Corp 1.53%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisSchwab
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%95.4%
Holdings275193

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or SCHG?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources