Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AVLV vs XLP: how they differ
AVLV and XLP hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and XLP hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AVLV | XLP |
|---|---|---|
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 2.06% | 9.06% |
| Walmart Inc | 0.89% | 10.84% |
| Target Corp | 0.83% | 3.87% |
| Kroger Co/The | 0.58% | 2.05% |
| Dollar Tree Inc | 0.43% | 1.43% |
| Dollar General Corp | 0.42% | 1.65% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co | 0.24% | 2.40% |
| Constellation Brands Inc | 0.20% | 1.26% |
| Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The | 0.19% | 1.27% |
| Molson Coors Beverage Co | 0.09% | 0.41% |
| Hershey Co/The | 0.08% | 1.69% |
| Brown-Forman Corp | 0.00% | 0.29% |
| Only in AVLV | Only in XLP |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc 4.57% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46% |
| Amazon.com Inc 3.18% | Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87% |
| Apple Inc 3.17% | Philip Morris International Inc 6.16% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.74% | Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59% | Altria Group Inc 4.55% |
| Caterpillar Inc 2.53% | Monster Beverage Corp 4.47% |
| Lam Research Corp 2.52% | PepsiCo Inc 4.34% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79% | Mondelez International Inc 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | XLP State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Avantis | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Large Cap Value | Consumer staples |
| Total return, 1 year | +31.0% | +6.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.5 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 84.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 275 | 34 |
AVLV in plain words
AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.
XLP in plain words
XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or XLP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and XLP returned +6.3%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AVLV or XLP?
- AVLV charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AVLV and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources