Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs MDY: how they differ

AVLV and MDY hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and MDY hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVMDY
Nextpower Inc0.46%0.49%
Burlington Stores Inc0.41%0.55%
Solstice Advanced Materials Inc0.34%0.39%
BorgWarner Inc0.34%0.38%
East West Bancorp Inc0.31%0.49%
Talen Energy Corp/Old0.30%0.48%
Permian Resources Corp0.28%0.40%
Exelixis Inc0.26%0.38%
Ovintiv Inc0.26%0.40%
Texas Roadhouse Inc0.25%0.35%
Ally Financial Inc0.24%0.35%
Ryder System Inc0.23%0.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in MDY
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
Apple Inc 3.17%MKS INC 0.83%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisState Street
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%0.0%
Holdings275400

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and MDY returned +13.0%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or MDY?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources