Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs FNDX: how they differ

AVLV and FNDX hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and FNDX hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and FNDX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVFNDX
Apple Inc3.17%4.64%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%2.29%
Amazon.com Inc3.18%1.86%
Microsoft Corp1.63%2.33%
Micron Technology Inc4.57%1.60%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.79%1.38%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%1.24%
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%0.99%
Walmart Inc0.89%1.01%
General Motors Co1.11%0.74%
Merck & Co Inc1.75%0.68%
ConocoPhillips1.17%0.66%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in FNDX
Flex Ltd 1.06%Intel Corp 2.57%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.79%Chevron Corp 1.49%
United Airlines Holdings Inc 0.68%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%
TechnipFMC PLC 0.54%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37%
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.53%Johnson & Johnson 0.97%
Nextpower Inc 0.46%CVS Health Corp 0.91%
Arch Capital Group Ltd 0.44%Cisco Systems Inc 0.90%
Chubb Ltd 0.44%Bank of America Corp 0.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisSchwab
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueFundamental U.S. Large Company
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+26.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+8.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.25%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%91.2%
Holdings275733

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or FNDX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and FNDX returned +26.1%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or FNDX?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and FNDX charges 0.25%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 91% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 35% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against FNDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against FNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-FNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources