Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs VT: how they differ

AVLV and VT hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and VT hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVVT
Apple Inc3.17%3.53%
Amazon.com Inc3.18%2.29%
Microsoft Corp1.63%2.73%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%1.21%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.79%0.72%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%0.59%
Micron Technology Inc4.57%0.52%
Walmart Inc0.89%0.52%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%0.41%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%0.37%
Netflix Inc0.91%0.36%
Lam Research Corp2.52%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in VT
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.53%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Argan Inc 0.16%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Viking Holdings Ltd 0.11%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
Hess Midstream LP 0.10%Tesla Inc 0.97%
Kodiak Gas Services Inc 0.06%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.69%
Opendoor Technologies Inc 0.05%Eli Lilly & Co 0.68%
Levi Strauss & Co 0.05%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
Paramount Skydance Corp 0.04%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanguard
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%55.2%
Holdings27510042

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and VT returned +18.9%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or VT?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources