Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs MOAT: how they differ

AVLV and MOAT hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and MOAT hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and MOAT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVMOAT
Microsoft Corp1.63%2.20%
Amazon.com Inc3.18%1.33%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%1.17%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%2.34%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.46%1.42%
LPL Financial Holdings Inc0.28%2.30%
Charles Schwab Corp/The0.28%2.45%
Tractor Supply Co0.27%1.28%
Constellation Brands Inc0.20%2.32%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The0.19%2.14%
Hershey Co/The0.08%1.22%
Jack Henry & Associates Inc0.06%1.33%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in MOAT
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Masco Corp 2.96%
Apple Inc 3.17%Kenvue Inc 2.59%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Airbnb Inc 2.56%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%NVIDIA Corp 2.45%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Datadog Inc 2.44%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Broadcom Inc 2.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisVanEck
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueMorningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.46%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%91.6%
Holdings27555

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or MOAT?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources