Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs DGRW: how they differ

AVLV and DGRW hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and DGRW hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and DGRW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVDGRW
Apple Inc3.17%3.87%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%2.97%
Caterpillar Inc2.53%1.80%
Microsoft Corp1.63%5.75%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%1.59%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.29%1.25%
Merck & Co Inc1.75%1.18%
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%1.15%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%1.71%
Lam Research Corp2.52%0.90%
American Express Co1.01%0.89%
Walmart Inc0.89%0.94%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in DGRW
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%NVIDIA CORP 7.95%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.92%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.88%
Morgan Stanley 1.37%HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 2.81%
General Motors Co 1.11%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.34%
Flex Ltd 1.06%BROADCOM INC 2.34%
Progressive Corp/The 1.04%ORACLE CORP 2.34%
United Parcel Service Inc 0.95%ABBVIE INC 2.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisWisdomTree
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueU.S. Quality Dividend Growth
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−5.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.28%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%96.7%
Holdings275197

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

DGRW in plain words

DGRW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or DGRW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and DGRW returned +12.4%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or DGRW?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and DGRW charges 0.28%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and DGRW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 97% of DGRW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against DGRW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against DGRW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-DGRW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources