Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs SPHD: how they differ

AVLV and SPHD hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and AVLV returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and SPHD hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVSPHD
Verizon Communications Inc1.64%3.49%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.59%1.55%
EOG Resources Inc0.90%1.99%
Williams Cos Inc/The0.84%1.61%
Comcast Corp0.75%1.60%
Prudential Financial Inc0.45%1.88%
Principal Financial Group Inc0.32%1.70%
T Rowe Price Group Inc0.29%2.10%
ONEOK Inc0.22%2.66%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in SPHD
Micron Technology Inc 4.57%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
Apple Inc 3.17%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.74%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
Lam Research Corp 2.52%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Kimco Realty Corp. 2.46%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Realty Income Corp. 2.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVLV and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisInvesco
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%95.7%
Holdings27549

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so AVLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or SPHD?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources