Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs SPHD: how they differ

ACWI and SPHD hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and SPHD hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWISPHD
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.66%1.55%
CHEVRON CORPORATION0.37%2.10%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.0.20%3.49%
AT&T INC.0.19%2.02%
PFIZER INC.0.15%2.99%
Altria Group, Inc.0.12%3.45%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY0.12%2.08%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION0.10%1.59%
COMCAST CORPORATION0.10%1.60%
THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.0.09%1.61%
U.S. BANCORP0.09%1.62%
EOG RESOURCES, INC.0.07%1.99%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in SPHD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
APPLE INC. 4.02%Conagra Brands, Inc. 2.33%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%BXP, Inc. 1.94%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Campbell's Co. (The) 1.93%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Pinnacle West Capital Corp. 1.85%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ACWI and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isMSCI ACWIS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%95.7%
Holdings230749

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or SPHD?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so SPHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources