Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVLV vs IGM: how they differ

AVLV and IGM hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IGM hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVLV and IGM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVLVIGM
Micron Technology Inc4.57%5.47%
Apple Inc3.17%7.92%
Meta Platforms Inc2.74%4.17%
Lam Research Corp2.52%2.37%
Microsoft Corp1.63%7.50%
Applied Materials Inc1.06%2.50%
KLA Corp0.93%1.72%
Netflix Inc0.91%1.31%
QUALCOMM Inc0.51%0.85%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.70%0.16%
CoreWeave Inc0.15%0.12%
Alphabet Inc0.06%4.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVLVOnly in IGM
Amazon.com Inc 3.18%NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.59%Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%
Caterpillar Inc 2.53%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%
Costco Wholesale Corp 2.06%Intel Corp. 2.88%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.79%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%
Merck & Co Inc 1.75%Sandisk Corp. 1.47%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.64%Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.21%
Union Pacific Corp 1.53%Texas Instruments, Inc. 1.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AVLV and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isU.S. Large Cap ValueExpanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year+31.0%+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.5 pts+15.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50084.5%92.0%
Holdings275295

AVLV in plain words

AVLV is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 275 positions, with the top ten at 26.9%.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IGM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +31.0% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or IGM?
AVLV charges 0.15% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so AVLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVLV against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVLV against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVLV-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources