CGDV · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
CGDV tracks the Dividend Value and returned +18.7% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Weight | |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp | 5.81% | |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.16% | |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | |
| Applied Materials Inc | 3.12% | |
| General Electric Co | 3.08% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 3.02% | |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd | 2.83% |
Compare CGDV
Also against BIL, BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GARP, GDX, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, IYW, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, LYTE, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, REMX, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPLG, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +2.0% | +3.3% | −1.3 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 6 months | +14.1% | +16.0% | −1.9 pts | −6.6 pts |
| 1 year | +18.7% | +17.5% | +1.2 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 3 years | +89.2% | +77.9% | +11.3 pts | −5.9 pts |
| Since listing | +114.5% | +89.7% | +24.8 pts | −1.3 pts |
In plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
| What it tracks | Dividend Value |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Jul 31, 2026) | 0.33% |
| Price | $49.38 |
| Listed since | Feb 24, 2022 |
| Net assets (SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for May 31, 2026) | $35.2bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −4.0% |
| Holdings | 53 |
| Top ten weight | 38.8% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | May 31, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 91.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 62.2% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 46.8% |
Questions people ask
- How has CGDV performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, CGDV returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +89.2%.
- What does CGDV cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year.
- What does CGDV hold?
- 53 positions as filed for May 31, 2026, with the top ten at 38.8% of the fund. 91% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is CGDV below its high?
- 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/CGDV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources