Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MUB returned +0.1%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGDV or MUB?

CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs MUB: how they differ

CGDV and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDV	Only in MUB
Microsoft Corp 5.81%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
General Electric Co 3.08%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGDV and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	iShares
What it is	Dividend Value	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.2 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	0.05%
Holdings	53	6603

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MUB returned +0.1%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or MUB?: CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources