Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AOR vs CGDV: how they differ
AOR and CGDV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AOR and CGDV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AOR | Only in CGDV |
|---|---|
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07% | Microsoft Corp 5.81% |
| iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09% | NVIDIA Corp 5.66% |
| iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02% | Broadcom Inc 5.16% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29% | Alphabet Inc 3.60% |
| iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% |
| iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99% | Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96% | Applied Materials Inc 3.12% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Capital |
| What it is | Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation | Dividend Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +18.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.33% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.0% |
| Holdings | 7 | 53 |
AOR in plain words
AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AOR or CGDV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AOR or CGDV?
- AOR charges 0.15% a year and CGDV charges 0.33%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do AOR and CGDV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AOR and 91% of CGDV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against CGDV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-CGDV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources