Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs CGGR: how they differ

CGDV and CGGR hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Capital Group Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and CGGR hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGDV and CGGR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGDVCGGR
NVIDIA Corp5.66%5.16%
Broadcom Inc5.16%5.40%
Microsoft Corp5.81%4.38%
Meta Platforms Inc3.33%7.09%
Alphabet Inc3.60%3.06%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund2.02%1.98%
Amazon.com Inc1.88%2.69%
Eli Lilly & Co3.15%1.81%
Apple Inc2.36%1.79%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt2.17%1.48%
General Electric Co3.08%1.11%
Intel Corp1.09%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in CGGR
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%Tesla Inc 5.85%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%Micron Technology Inc 4.86%
RTX Corp 2.82%Alphabet Inc 3.36%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%Visa Inc 2.34%
Carrier Global Corp 2.64%TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%
Starbucks Corp 2.26%Netflix Inc 1.85%
Union Pacific Corp 2.12%Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.68%
Wells Fargo & Co 1.99%Cloudflare Inc 1.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGDV and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalCapital
What it isDividend ValueGrowth
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.39%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%80.6%
Holdings5389

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or CGGR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and CGGR returned +7.2%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or CGGR?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and CGGR charges 0.39%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and CGGR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 81% of CGGR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 38% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against CGGR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against CGGR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-CGGR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources