Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs XLC: how they differ
CGDV and XLC hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLC hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 13.10% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 19.93% |
| Comcast Corp | 1.75% | 4.71% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in XLC |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | Alphabet Inc 10.44% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | Netflix Inc 4.84% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Electronic Arts Inc 4.64% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | Walt Disney Co/The 4.49% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 3.02% | T-Mobile US Inc 4.16% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83% | Verizon Communications Inc 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | State Street |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Communication services |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | −2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −19.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 23 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLC in plain words
XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLC returned −2.0%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLC?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources