Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs FLKR: how they differ
CGDV and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in FLKR |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | SK HYNIX INC 23.85% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Franklin |
| What it is | Dividend Value | FTSE South Korea |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +146.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +128.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 157 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FLKR in plain words
FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FLKR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or FLKR?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and FLKR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of FLKR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against FLKR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-FLKR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources