Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs FLKR: how they differ
ACWX and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACWX | Only in FLKR |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69% | SK HYNIX INC 23.85% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.54% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.33% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07% | SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86% | SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81% | HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79% | KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75% |
| Novartis AG 0.77% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Franklin |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | FTSE South Korea |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +146.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +128.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 1759 | 157 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.
FLKR in plain words
FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or FLKR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or FLKR?
- ACWX charges 0.32% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ACWX and FLKR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of FLKR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against FLKR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-FLKR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources