Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs FXI: how they differ
CGDV and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in FXI |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | MEITUAN 4.79% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | China Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | −13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.73% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 52 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FXI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and FXI returned −13.8%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or FXI?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources