Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and SHV returned +3.6%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGDV or SHV?

CGDV charges 0.33% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs SHV: how they differ

CGDV and SHV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDV	Only in SHV
Microsoft Corp 5.81%	United States of America 17.17%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%	United States of America 12.38%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%	United States of America 9.88%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%	United States of America 8.60%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%	United States of America 8.55%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%	United States of America 8.38%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%	United States of America 6.85%
General Electric Co 3.08%	United States of America 6.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGDV and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	iShares
What it is	Dividend Value	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.2 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	0.15%
Holdings	53	13

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and SHV returned +3.6%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SHV?: CGDV charges 0.33% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources