Which returned more over the last year, BOND or CGDV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or CGDV?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and CGDV charges 0.33%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs CGDV: how they differ

BOND and CGDV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and CGDV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in CGDV
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	Microsoft Corp 5.81%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	NVIDIA Corp 5.66%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	Broadcom Inc 5.16%
United States Treasury 2.93%	Alphabet Inc 3.60%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%
United States Treasury 2.22%	Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	Applied Materials Inc 3.12%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	General Electric Co 3.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BOND and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Capital
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	Dividend Value
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+18.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+1.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.33%
Holdings	1565	53

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or CGDV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or CGDV?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and CGDV charges 0.33%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against CGDV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against CGDV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-CGDV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources