Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs XLF: how they differ
CGDV and XLF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | XLF |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Co | 1.99% | 3.34% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.90% | 11.57% |
| Mastercard Inc | 1.30% | 5.47% |
| Apollo Global Management Inc | 1.08% | 0.72% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in XLF |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | Visa Inc 7.51% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | Bank of America Corp 4.91% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | Morgan Stanley 3.31% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Citigroup Inc 3.15% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | American Express Co 2.38% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | Charles Schwab Corp/The 1.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | State Street |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Financials |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +7.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 76 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLF in plain words
XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLF returned +7.6%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLF?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources