Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SPLG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and SPLG returned +17.6%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs SPLG: how they differ

CGDV and SPLG are both equity index funds, and over the year CGDV returned more, +18.7% against +17.6%.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and S&P 500, book from IVV.

CGDV and SPLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	S&P
What it is	Dividend Value	S&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.2 pts	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	not published
Holdings	53	not filed

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPLG in plain words

SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SPLG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and SPLG returned +17.6%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against SPLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against SPLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-SPLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources