Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or EMB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and EMB returned +2.8%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGDV or EMB?

CGDV charges 0.33% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs EMB: how they differ

CGDV and EMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDV	Only in EMB
Microsoft Corp 5.81%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%	Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%	Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%	Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%
General Electric Co 3.08%	UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGDV and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	iShares
What it is	Dividend Value	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+2.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.2 pts	−14.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	0.39%
Holdings	53	681

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or EMB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and EMB returned +2.8%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or EMB?: CGDV charges 0.33% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against EMB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against EMB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-EMB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources