Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs USFR: how they differ
CGDV and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in USFR |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | |
| General Electric Co 3.08% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | WisdomTree |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Floating Rate Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −13.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Holdings | 53 | 4 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
USFR in plain words
USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or USFR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and USFR returned +4.1%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or USFR?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so USFR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources