Which returned more over the last year, AOR or USFR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and USFR returned +4.1%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, AOR or USFR?

AOR charges 0.15% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AOR vs USFR: how they differ

AOR and USFR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AOR returned more over the year.

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AOR and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AOR	Only in USFR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF 35.07%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.04%
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF 32.09%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.01%
iShares Core MSCI International Develope 17.02%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 28.00%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF 7.29%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 15.95%
iShares Core International Aggregate Bon 5.57%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF 1.99%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF 0.96%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

AOR and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF	USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	WisdomTree
What it is	Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation	Floating Rate Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+11.3%	+4.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−6.2 pts	−13.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	7	4

AOR in plain words

AOR is an index equity fund tracking the Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

USFR in plain words

USFR is a bond fund tracking the Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AOR or USFR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AOR returned +11.3% and USFR returned +4.1%, so AOR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AOR or USFR?: AOR charges 0.15% a year and USFR charges 0.15%, so AOR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOR against USFR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOR against USFR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AOR-USFR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources