Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs XLG: how they differ
CGDV and XLG hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLG hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp | 5.81% | 8.18% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 13.10% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.16% | 4.85% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 6.05% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 3.61% |
| Apple Inc | 2.36% | 10.76% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 2.00% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.90% | 2.28% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 6.99% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.34% | 1.74% |
| Mastercard Inc | 1.30% | 1.11% |
| AbbVie Inc | 1.35% | 1.01% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Alphabet Inc. 4.82% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83% | Tesla, Inc. 2.90% |
| RTX Corp 2.82% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35% |
| British American Tobacco PLC 2.66% | Walmart Inc. 1.56% |
| Carrier Global Corp 2.64% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.56% |
| Starbucks Corp 2.26% | Visa Inc. 1.50% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 2.17% | Johnson & Johnson 1.50% |
| Union Pacific Corp 2.12% | Costco Wholesale Corp. 1.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Invesco |
| What it is | Dividend Value | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 51 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLG returned +12.2%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLG?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources