Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs EWY: how they differ

CGDV and EWY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWY returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and EWY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in EWY
Microsoft Corp 5.81%SK hynix Inc. 31.02%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD 3.44%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%SK Square Co., Ltd. 3.10%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.45%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%KB Financial Group Inc. 1.40%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%HYUNDAI MOBIS CO.,LTD 1.22%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO., LTD. 1.22%
General Electric Co 3.08%SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD. 1.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGDV and EWY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitaliShares
What it isDividend ValueMSCI South Korea
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+147.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+130.4 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.59%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%0.0%
Holdings5382

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EWY in plain words

EWY is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +147.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 82 positions, with the top ten at 70.0%. It sat 13.9% below its high of Jun 18, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or EWY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and EWY returned +147.9%, so EWY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or EWY?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and EWY charges 0.59%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and EWY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of EWY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against EWY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against EWY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-EWY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources