Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs SCHX: how they differ
CGDV and SCHX hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SCHX hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 7.51% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.81% | 4.89% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 3.24% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.16% | 3.10% |
| Apple Inc | 2.36% | 6.71% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 2.02% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 3.87% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 3.15% | 1.28% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 1.90% | 1.18% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.34% | 0.89% |
| Intel Corp | 1.09% | 0.79% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 3.02% | 0.70% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in SCHX |
|---|---|
| British American Tobacco PLC 2.66% | Alphabet Inc 2.58% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 2.17% | Tesla Inc 1.79% |
| Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.02% | Micron Technology Inc 1.60% |
| TC Energy Corp 1.33% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.27% |
| Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.82% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.23% |
| Visa Inc 0.80% | |
| Johnson & Johnson 0.80% | |
| Walmart Inc 0.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Schwab |
| What it is | Dividend Value | U.S. Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +16.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 94.9% |
| Holdings | 53 | 748 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHX in plain words
SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SCHX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or SCHX?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources