Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVUS vs CGDV: how they differ

AVUS and CGDV hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and AVUS returned more over the year.

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVUS and CGDV hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVUS and CGDV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVUSCGDV
NVIDIA Corp5.49%5.66%
Microsoft Corp3.85%5.81%
Alphabet Inc2.42%3.60%
Apple Inc5.37%2.36%
Meta Platforms Inc2.21%3.33%
Amazon.com Inc3.68%1.88%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.20%1.90%
Broadcom Inc1.18%5.16%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.07%1.34%
Eli Lilly & Co0.84%3.15%
Applied Materials Inc0.68%3.12%
Intel Corp0.58%1.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVUSOnly in CGDV
Micron Technology Inc 2.40%Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%
Alphabet Inc 1.94%British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Lam Research Corp 1.00%Carrier Global Corp 2.64%
Caterpillar Inc 0.92%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 2.17%
Tesla Inc 0.80%Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.02%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.69%Linde PLC 1.95%
Visa Inc 0.68%Philip Morris International Inc 1.54%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 0.67%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

AVUS and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisCapital
What it isU.S. EquityDividend Value
Total return, 1 year+21.6%+18.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.1 pts+1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.33%
Already in the S&P 50084.4%91.0%
Holdings187553

AVUS in plain words

AVUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1875 positions, with the top ten at 29.7%.

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVUS or CGDV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVUS returned +21.6% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so AVUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVUS or CGDV?
AVUS charges 0.15% a year and CGDV charges 0.33%, so AVUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVUS and CGDV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVUS and 91% of CGDV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVUS against CGDV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVUS against CGDV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AVUS-CGDV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources