Which returned more over the last year, BWET or CGDV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs CGDV: how they differ

BWET is a commodity fund and CGDV an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +18.7%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.

BWET and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Breakwave	Capital
What it is	Tanker Shipping	Dividend Value
Total return, 1 year	+5129.6%	+18.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5112.1 pts	+1.2 pts
Expense ratio	not published	0.33%
Holdings	not filed	53

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or CGDV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and CGDV returned +18.7%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against CGDV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against CGDV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-CGDV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources