Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs BWET: how they differ
ACWX is an equity index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +23.0%.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Breakwave |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | Tanker Shipping |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +5129.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | +5112.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | not published |
| Holdings | 1759 | not filed |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BWET?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against BWET, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-BWET Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources