Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs BWET: how they differ
AGG is a bond index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against −0.7%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Breakwave |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Tanker Shipping |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +5129.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | +5112.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | not published |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or BWET?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against BWET, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-BWET Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources