Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs MAGS: how they differ
CGDV and MAGS hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and MAGS hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 4.15% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.81% | 3.62% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 3.59% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 2.89% |
| Apple Inc | 2.36% | 4.12% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.88% | 4.11% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc 3.02% | |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83% | |
| RTX Corp 2.82% | |
| British American Tobacco PLC 2.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Roundhill |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 53 | 9 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or MAGS?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources