Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs XLB: how they differ
CGDV and XLB hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Linde PLC | 1.95% | 14.08% |
| International Paper Co | 1.74% | 2.70% |
| Smurfit Westrock PLC | 1.03% | 3.25% |
| Air Products and Chemicals Inc | 0.74% | 4.63% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in XLB |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | Newmont Corp 5.85% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.31% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | Corteva Inc 4.97% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | Sherwin-Williams Co/The 4.95% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | Ecolab Inc 4.73% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Vulcan Materials Co 4.72% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | CRH PLC 4.67% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | Martin Marietta Materials Inc 4.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | XLB State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | State Street |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Materials |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 26 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLB in plain words
XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLB returned +12.0%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLB?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources