Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs GRNY: how they differ

CGDV and GRNY hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and GRNY hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGDV and GRNY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGDVGRNY
Alphabet Inc3.60%2.96%
Broadcom Inc5.16%2.94%
NVIDIA Corp5.66%2.46%
Microsoft Corp5.81%2.38%
Apple Inc2.36%2.40%
Meta Platforms Inc3.33%2.24%
Union Pacific Corp2.12%2.39%
General Electric Co3.08%2.04%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.90%2.33%
Amazon.com Inc1.88%3.02%
Amgen Inc0.79%2.15%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc0.74%2.48%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in GRNY
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83%Strategy Inc 3.01%
RTX Corp 2.82%Arista Networks Inc 2.88%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%Netflix Inc 2.82%
Carrier Global Corp 2.64%KLA Corp 2.75%
Starbucks Corp 2.26%Caterpillar Inc 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGDV and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalFundstrat
What it isDividend ValueFundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.75%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%97.0%
Holdings5340

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or GRNY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or GRNY?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources