Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs XLI: how they differ

CGDV and XLI hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XLI hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGDV and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGDVXLI
General Electric Co3.08%6.77%
RTX Corp2.82%4.44%
Union Pacific Corp2.12%2.81%
Carrier Global Corp2.64%0.99%
General Dynamics Corp0.83%1.56%
Illinois Tool Works Inc0.82%1.23%
Uber Technologies Inc0.67%2.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDVOnly in XLI
Microsoft Corp 5.81%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%GE Vernova Inc 5.48%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%Deere & Co 2.77%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02%Trane Technologies PLC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGDV and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalState Street
What it isDividend ValueIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.0%100.0%
Holdings5381

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XLI returned +14.3%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or XLI?
CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources