Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs IGM: how they differ
CGDV and IGM hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and IGM hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp | 5.81% | 7.50% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 7.97% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.16% | 7.61% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 4.45% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 4.17% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 3.12% | 2.50% |
| Apple Inc | 2.36% | 7.92% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 3.02% | 2.02% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 1.21% | 1.18% |
| Intel Corp | 1.09% | 2.88% |
| Oracle Corp | 1.60% | 1.08% |
| Corning Inc | 0.84% | 0.87% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in IGM |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83% | Alphabet, Inc. 3.55% |
| RTX Corp 2.82% | Lam Research Corp. 2.37% |
| British American Tobacco PLC 2.66% | KLA Corp. 1.72% |
| Carrier Global Corp 2.64% | Sandisk Corp. 1.47% |
| Starbucks Corp 2.26% | Netflix, Inc. 1.31% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 2.17% | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 1.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Expanded Tech Sector |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +32.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +15.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.37% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 92.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 295 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or IGM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or IGM?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 35% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources