Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs XOVR: how they differ
CGDV and XOVR hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and XOVR hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGDV | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.66% | 9.48% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.60% | 6.53% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.33% | 4.47% |
| Only in CGDV | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | Applovin Corp 3.95% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 3.02% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 2.83% | Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% |
| RTX Corp 2.82% | Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | ERShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 53 | 32 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or XOVR?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so CGDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources