Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGDV vs EFA: how they differ
CGDV and EFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and EFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGDV | Only in EFA |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.81% | ASML Holding N.V. 2.60% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.66% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.16% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.36% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.60% | Novartis AG 1.30% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% | Nestle S.A. 1.21% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% | SHELL PLC 1.20% |
| Applied Materials Inc 3.12% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05% |
| General Electric Co 3.08% | COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Dividend Value | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +18.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.32% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 53 | 705 |
CGDV in plain words
CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or EFA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and EFA returned +18.2%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or EFA?
- CGDV charges 0.33% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGDV and EFA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 0% of EFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against EFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGDV-EFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources