IYW · iShares U.S. Technology ETF
IYW tracks the U.S. Technology and returned +34.9% over the past year.
Key facts
Its ten largest equity positions
| Holding | Ticker | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA | NVDA | 14.10% | |
| APPLE | AAPL | 13.20% | |
| MICROSOFT | MSFT | 10.75% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS A | GOOGL | 5.48% | |
| ALPHABET CLASS C | GOOG | 4.44% | |
| META PLATFORMS CLASS A | META | 4.17% | |
| BROADCOM INC | AVGO | 4.07% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY | MU | 3.35% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | AMD | 3.08% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION | INTC | 2.27% |
Compare IYW
Also against BIL, BINC, BITO, BND, BNDX, BOND, BOXX, BSV, BWET, CGBL, CGDV, CGGR, COWZ, CTA, DBMF, DFUS, DGRO, DGRW, DIA, DVY, DYNF, EDV, EEM, EFA, EMB, EMXC, EWJ, EWT, EWY, EWZ, EZU, FBCG, FDVV, FENI, FLKR, FNDX, FTEC, FXI, GARP, GDX, GLD, GLDM, GOVT, GRNY, HDV, HGER, HYG, HYMB, IALT, IAU, IBB, IDEV, IEF, IEFA, IEI, IEMG, IGIB, IGM, IGSB, IJH, IJR, IJS, IJT, ILF, INDA, ITOT, IUSB, IVV, IWB, IWC, IWD, IWF, IWM, IWO, IXUS, IYE, IYR, JAAA, JNK, KRE, LQD, LYTE, MAGS, MBB, MDY, MGK, MINT, MOAT, MTUM, MUB, NOBL, ONEQ, PDBC, PFF, PULS, PVAL, QQQ, QQQM, QUAL, RDVY, REMX, RSP, SCHB, SCHD, SCHF, SCHG, SCHH, SCHP, SCHX, SDY, SGOV, SHV, SHY, SIVR, SLV, SPHD, SPHQ, SPMO, SPSB, SPY, SPYD, SPYG, SPYM, TIP, TLT, URTH, USFR, USHY, USMV, USO, VB, VBIL, VBK, VBR, VCIT, VCLT, VCSH, VDC, VDE, VEA, VEU, VGIT, VGK, VGLT, VGSH, VGT, VHT, VIG, VLUE, VNQ, VO, VOE, VONG, VOO, VOOG, VOX, VPL, VPU, VT, VTEB, VTI, VTIP, VTV, VTWO, VUG, VUSB, VWO, VXF, VXUS, VYM, VYMI, XBI, XHB, XLB, XLC, XLE, XLF, XLG, XLI, XLK, XLP, XLRE, XLU, XLV, XLY, XOP, XOVR, XRT.
Period by period
| Window | Total return | S&P 500 | Gap to S&P 500 | Gap to Nasdaq-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | +3.5% | +3.3% | +0.2 pts | +4.3 pts |
| 6 months | +35.3% | +16.0% | +19.3 pts | +14.7 pts |
| 1 year | +34.9% | +17.5% | +17.4 pts | +12.0 pts |
| 3 years | +134.1% | +77.9% | +56.2 pts | +39.0 pts |
| Since listing | +1848.0% | +804.4% | +1043.6 pts | +174.0 pts |
In plain words
IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 64.9%.
| What it tracks | U.S. Technology |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Index equity fund |
| Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Aug 21, 2026) | 0.37% |
| Price | $253.25 |
| Listed since | Jan 4, 2010 |
| Net assets (the issuer own daily fund list, as of Sep 11, 2026) | $25.3bn |
| Below its high (ETFIQ) | −2.5% |
| Holdings | 151 |
| Top ten weight | 64.9% |
| Holdings as of (SEC N-PORT) | Sep 10, 2026 |
| Already in the S&P 500, by weight (ETFIQ) | 95.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 (ETFIQ) | 56.4% |
| Already in the Nasdaq-100, by weight (ETFIQ) | 85.1% |
Questions people ask
- How has IYW performed?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, IYW returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500. Over three years the figure is +134.1%.
- What does IYW cost?
- The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year.
- What does IYW hold?
- 151 positions as filed for Sep 10, 2026, with the top ten at 64.9% of the fund. 96% of its weight is in stocks the S&P 500 also holds.
- How far is IYW below its high?
- 2.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026, measured on the reinvested series to Sep 11, 2026.
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Funds near this one
Where IYW is written about
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW, core index fund, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/iyw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ covers leveraged and inverse, thematic, buffer, option-income, core index and spot crypto ETFs. This fund is here because the other funds here are measured against it and portfolios hold it. ETFIQ is an independent publisher and makes no recommendations. Standards and sources