Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs IYW: how they differ

IGM and IYW hold 83% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and IYW hold 83% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMIYW
MICROSOFT10.11%10.75%
APPLE9.14%13.20%
NVIDIA8.89%14.10%
ALPHABET CLASS A4.23%5.48%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A4.87%4.17%
BROADCOM INC7.42%4.07%
ALPHABET CLASS C3.39%4.44%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY4.73%3.35%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.66%3.08%
INTEL CORPORATION2.21%2.27%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A1.70%1.83%
LAM RESEARCH1.66%1.85%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in IYW
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.89%VERTIV HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.47%
NETFLIX 1.43%DOORDASH CLASS A 0.37%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.87%LEIDOS HOLDINGS 0.08%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.86%SS AND C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS 0.08%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING CLASS A 0.69%TOAST CLASS A 0.08%
ACCENTURE PLC CLASS A 0.49%CACI INTERNATIONAL INC CLASS A 0.07%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 0.34%IREN 0.07%
LUMENTUM HOLDINGS 0.32%MAPLEBEAR 0.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IGM and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isExpanded Tech SectorU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%95.5%
Holdings272151

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 272 positions, with the top ten at 58.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 64.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IYW?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or IYW?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IGM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 83% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against IYW, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-iyw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources