Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IGM vs QTEC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IGM returned +21.7% to QTEC's +29.4%; 41% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IGM and QTEC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and $4.6bn for First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund.
Pair scorecard
IGM costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; IGM is 2.4 times larger.
| Measure | IGM | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +29.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 7.6%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index | Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.55% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $4.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 41% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.8% | 25.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
May 12, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,067 weekly returnsIGM returned more: +2,133.0% to +1,660.9%. IGM swung less: 21.6% to 24.3%. IGM fell slightly less at its worst: −52.5% to −57.8%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | IGM | QTEC | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +2,133.0% | +1,660.9% | IGM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.3% | +15.0% | IGM (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +1,908.1% | +1,499.9% | IGM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 21.6% | 24.3% | IGM | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.6% | 16.6% | IGM | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −52.5% | −57.8% | IGM (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.73 | 0.63 | IGM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.08 | 0.92 | IGM | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.31 | 0.26 | IGM | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,067 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and QTEC hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
41% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IGM and QTEC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM and QTEC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IGM follows S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index and QTEC follows Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Index.
- Holdings in common. 41% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IGM returned +21.7% and QTEC +29.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.7 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IGM
IGM tracks an index of Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 56.8%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
QTEC
QTEC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 25.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or QTEC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +21.7% and QTEC +29.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or QTEC?
- IGM is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IGM against QTEC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-qtec
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IGM against QTEC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-qtec
[IGM against QTEC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igm-vs-qtec)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.